Discussion Is Government listening?

In the last few weeks our federal government has expedited the passing of Bill C-15 and C-9. These are both bills that were objected to by a significant number of tax paying citizens. They were both pushed through the legislative process with great speed to receive royal assent.

Was there a need for speed given the public resistance to the content of both bills? Would it not have been prudent for a government that respected public opinion to step back and reconsider the bill content and why taxpayers opposed it. It's obvious the Carney government has no respect for those that voted him into power to listen to their concerns. His greatest interest seems to be with the NEW World Order and China not with Canada's democratic viability.

Trudeau one and Trudeau two set the stage - Carney was Trudeau two's key adviser - installed as Prime Minister - is Carney the closer?

Both Bill C-9 and C-15 restrict our ability as tax paying citizens to be free thinkers and to express our positions as citizens in a supposed democracy. The Carney government seems to treat communist China with more respect than he treats tax paying Canadian citizens.

Trudeau did say when he was in office that he admired China for what they could get done. I think, what that meant was that the Chinese government, because of a communist regime, could do whatever the party wanted to do. Trudeau liked China because the government did not have to answer to the public
I see Canada as being there now.

I completely agree with your concern about the speed of these bills. When something like Bill C-9 and C-15 is pushed through quickly despite clear public resistance, it raises serious questions about whether the government is actually listening. In a democracy, process matters just as much as policy. If people feel ignored, trust starts to break down, and that’s exactly what we’re seeing now.

What stands out to me is not just the content of these bills, but how they were handled. Rushing legislation through without fully addressing public concerns gives the impression that input from citizens is more of a formality than something that actually influences decisions. That’s a dangerous direction for any democratic system.

Here is a petition we can sign that closes April 9, 2026, stating that: We, the undersigned, citizens and residents of Canada, call upon the House of Commons to 1. Oppose Bill C-9, the Com batting Hate Act, and any future limitation of the right to protest;
2. Guarantee the right to freedom of speech and assembly;
3. Protect and strengthen democratic and civil rights rather than criminalize protest.

Petition e-7222 - Petitions