Search results

Personally I do not think there are any ethical tax loopholes because for people who simply can not afford to know by getting financial advisors then it creates a gap in peoples ability to pay tax favouring that of the rich.

I think that there is a line between tax cuts and just plainly over taxing our communities, I think that everyone agrees in Canada we are over taxing our country and it is causing our population to be close to broke. Now that being said I think that people are having issues with managing money...

I think what you’re pointing to is less about one specific party and more about a broader shift in how political parties operate. Conventions used to be places where parties refined priorities based on what Canadians were dealing with in real time. Now, they often feel more like spaces where...

Yeah that is kind of what caught my attention too. It is not just the bill itself, it is how it got to this point. When something reaches a third reading, it means it has already gone pretty far through the process, and a lot of people are only just starting to hear about it now. That timing...

I think more people also need to understand that the bill is still in the Senate committee stage. That means there is still an opportunity for changes to be made. Public awareness at this point can actually have an impact, but only if people are paying attention and engaging with the process.

That is the same thing that I was thinking.

Mistakes are also a big risk. Even limited access could have consequences if authorities misinterpret data. Without judicial review, there’s no independent check to prevent errors that could seriously affect people’s lives.

Maybe it comes down to habit. Being careful about what we click and share might not stop it completely but at least it reduces how much we’re influenced

Sometimes I catch myself agreeing with posts just because I keep seeing them. It’s wild how much influence repeated exposure has

Same in marketing. I’d focus on projects that actually make a difference, not just chasing KPIs or revenue targets

I’m in marketing, but if money wasn’t a concern, I’d switch to environmental work or some kind of community projects. Makes more sense to me

At least in this case, no injuries were reported and environmental monitoring started quickly, which is good.

That’s true, but analysts are saying Valero’s stock actually went up because the overall market is tight and prices have been rising due to global tensions

I saw that too. They’ve confirmed no injuries and the shelter‑in‑place was lifted after tests showed the air quality wasn’t dangerous, which is reassuring.

I budgeted a bit for surprises but it still didn’t cover everything in the first year.

I underestimated property taxes. I thought they were included somewhere but they are a separate expense entirely.

For me, it really depends on family plans. If I want kids soon, I’d probably lean toward a house.

True, but multiplying reports by 30 and jumping to a massive number is a big assumption

Yeah but we have to be careful here, one person saying something in a hearing doesn’t automatically make it true

Yeah instead of accepting that a lot of things are just complicated and messy

I just think people should take the useful parts, like being aware of influence, without going all in on the extreme claims

But you cant deny it works for visibility. Politicians today basically have to play the media game differently

It matters because of reach. Rogan has a massive audience, even outside Canada. That kind of exposure can shift opinions or at least get people paying attention

And better access to information would help keep it from going there in the first place.

Again, this is why transparency matters. If people had clearer info, there’d be less speculation.

Sure, but completely blocking access creates unnecessary suspicion. That’s just bad policy optics.

The FOI request denial is the weirdest part to me. Why shut people out of information unless there’s something controversial?

I’m less worried about lawsuits and more about trust. like once people feel the government can just bend rules when it suits them, it’s hard to get that trust back

I agree, protecting home owners is important. We have gone way too soft on crime in recent times.

It honestly just sounds like a poorly thought-out rule that’s now blowing up bigger than it needed to.

yeah I have been hating all of these fast fashion trends that are on the internet right now