• Voice4 Allows You to Speak Freely and Share Your Voice Without being Tracked or Monitored.

Discussion Should Billionaires Exist?

  • Thread starter Thread starter FickleLogic
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 16
  • Views Views: Views 180
FickleLogic

FickleLogic

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 28, 2026
Topics
5
Posts
116
Likes
22
From
Kitchener, ON
Country flag
I’ve been thinking about this a lot lately… do we really need billionaires? I get that a lot of them worked hard, built businesses, and took big risks. Some of them even do a lot of charity work or fund cool projects. On paper, it seems like they’re contributing something.

But then I look at how much money they actually have compared to everyone else, and it feels kind of crazy. A handful of people controlling as much wealth as millions of other people just doesn’t sit right with me. It makes you wonder how fair the system really is and how much power money gives people.

Some argue that billionaires actually help the economy because they invest in companies, hire people, and create new technologies. That’s true, but at the same time, it’s hard to ignore how much inequality it creates.

So what do you all think? Is it okay for someone to have that much money if they’ve “earned” it, or is having billionaires in society a problem that we need to rethink?
 
Honestly, I think billionaires are a symptom of how the system works, not just individual effort. Some people do work really hard, but the fact that a few people can end up with more money than millions of others combined says something about inequality in general.
 
I feel like the bigger issue is how much power comes with that kind of wealth. When someone has billions, they can influence politics, media, and basically shape society in ways most people can’t. That’s where it starts to feel unfair
 
LilyB said:
I feel like the bigger issue is how much power comes with that kind of wealth. When someone has billions, they can influence politics, media, and basically shape society in ways most people can’t. That’s where it starts to feel unfair
Click to expand...
I think it also depends on what they do with their money. Someone hoarding billions just for personal luxury feels different from someone using it to start companies or fund solutions to big problems.
 
But even if a billionaire donates tons to charity, it doesn’t fix the fact that the system allows them to accumulate that much in the first place. Maybe there should be limits or higher taxes so the wealth doesn’t get so concentrated.
 
istara said:
But even if a billionaire donates tons to charity, it doesn’t fix the fact that the system allows them to accumulate that much in the first place. Maybe there should be limits or higher taxes so the wealth doesn’t get so concentrated.
Click to expand...
I agree with Tara. The debate shouldn’t just be about whether billionaires “deserve” their money, it should be about whether society should allow that level of inequality
 
It’s a tricky balance. Some level of wealth can incentivize innovation and risk-taking, but extreme concentration creates social and economic problems. The real question might be how to allow success without letting it create such an enormous gap between a few people and everyone else.
 
Yeah, I think there’s a difference between being very rich and being a billionaire. There’s nothing wrong with being successful, but when someone has more money than entire countries combined, it starts to feel like the system is broken
 
Addressing the existence of billionaires -- or any other titanically wealthy individual -- is missing the mark because it is the fiat money system itself and the perverse incentive structures surrounding it that deserve our attention.


Human beings -- like all primates -- have an inherent sense or instinct for fairness. A scientist and researcher named Frans de Waal did interesting research into the primate instincts of fairness, and I recommend that you watch that this three-minute clip ().

What is Usury - slide 1.png
 
Woof said:
Addressing the existence of billionaires -- or any other titanically wealthy individual -- is missing the mark because it is the fiat money system itself and the perverse incentive structures surrounding it that deserve our attention...
Click to expand...
Woof @Woof
I get what you’re saying about the system being the bigger issue, but I think focusing only on fiat money kinda sidesteps the original question a bit. Even if the system is flawed, billionaires are still a product of it, and they benefit from it the most.

Also, bringing up fairness (like the monkey experiment) actually kind of supports the concern about billionaires, not dismisses it. If people naturally react to unfair distribution, then seeing extreme wealth gaps isn’t just a “system problem,” it’s something people are wired to question.

I guess where I’m at is: yeah, maybe the system is the root cause, but shouldn’t we still question the outcomes it produces? Like if a system consistently leads to a tiny group holding massive amounts of wealth, isn’t that worth addressing directly too, not just philosophically?

I couldn't really tell if you were disagreeing or agreeing but that's my analysis on it.
 
FickleLogic @FickleLogic Woof @Woof
Personally I think that we're also forgetting that the people who are at the center of our government systems are actively enabling these billionaires. The mega wealthy fund our government candidates and in turn they create laws that benefit them and then they support more and it's just a terrible cycle that keeps perpetuating itself.
 
FickleLogic said:
I couldn't really tell if you were disagreeing or agreeing but that's my analysis on it.
Click to expand...

No disagreement, just different focus. Personally, I wish not to grant the state any meaningful power to impose wealth accumulation restrictions. That will only lead to other restrictions in some government-led scheme of "social justice."

When incentive structures are fair, transparent, and meaningful, human beings will naturally develop healthy systems *if* they remain vigilant, interested, and active in their communities. And yes, that's fantasy land, but it's something to aim for, or to navigate towards.

I wrote "missing the mark" with reference to billionaires. So that means the bullseye (the mark) remains untouched, but the overall target has been struck.
 

Attachments

  • Game B - sound money 1.jpg
    Game B - sound money 1.jpg
    110.6 KB · Views: 25
  • Game B - sound money 4.jpg
    Game B - sound money 4.jpg
    109.5 KB · Views: 22
  • Game B - sound money 2.jpg
    Game B - sound money 2.jpg
    272.1 KB · Views: 21
  • fiat money system - wide.jpeg
    fiat money system - wide.jpeg
    275.6 KB · Views: 24
Woof said:
No disagreement, just different focus. Personally, I wish not to grant the state any meaningful power to impose wealth accumulation restrictions. That will only lead to other restrictions in some government-led scheme of "social justice."...
Click to expand...
I agree, the more control we give any governing body over us, the more power we will lose to self regulate as a society.
Woof said:
And yes, that's fantasy land, but it's something to aim for, or to navigate towards.
Click to expand...
And yeah, unfortunately we can't live in an ideal society because there are some people out there who want nothing more than to cause chaos.
 
Woof said:
No disagreement, just different focus. Personally, I wish not to grant the state any meaningful power to impose wealth accumulation restrictions. That will only lead to other restrictions in some government-led scheme of "social justice."

When incentive structures are fair, transparent, and meaningful, human beings will naturally develop healthy systems *if* they remain vigilant, interested, and active in their communities. And yes, that's fantasy land, but it's something to aim for, or to navigate towards.

I wrote "missing the mark" with reference to billionaires. So that means the bullseye (the mark) remains untouched, but the overall target has been struck.
Click to expand...
I see what you mean more now, I agree we don't need more restrictions but instead we need people to be able to self regulate instead of the state. Don't think that can ever realistically happen but like you said it's nice to work towards.
 
KameronM said:
I see what you mean more now, I agree we don't need more restrictions but instead we need people to be able to self regulate instead of the state. Don't think that can ever realistically happen but like you said it's nice to work towards.
Click to expand...
It's good to have an ideal to look forward to, in order to look what we should strive to be.
 
I personally think that billionaires should exist, simply due to the fact that they have worked hard in their life and they have worked the system to get ahead of everyone else. NOW, there are obvious limitations and dues they should have to pay for the people of their country but they still need to be able to make money as motivation to keep working.
 
  • Contact  |  Help  |   Privacy  |   Rules  |   Terms

    Logo

    • Back
    Top